Sunday, January 5, 2014

Revenge of the Listicle, aka Listicle Rides Again, or, How I Learned to Hate Dating and Regard Celibacy as an Exciting Option

http://www.cracked.com/blog/4-things-i-learned-from-worst-online-dating-profile-ever/

WARNING: This is a long personal essay. Get out now while you can.

Since yesterday, I have seen this article and snippets of it circulating on Facebook and elsewhere on the internet. Someone I know on Facebook posted a screen cap that they had found online of this "person's" profile saying that this was possibly the worst person he had ever seen on the internet. One of his friends recognized the profile as being the one created by the writer of said listicle, and linked him to it, at which point he was briefly relieved. However, this apparently had already opened up the floodgates for people on his thread to vent about the general awfulness of online dating. I was pretty convinced that I had some special stories to share, and weighed in to tell some of mine. However, I feel that I must offer you a disclaimer: I don't know much about dating. I never "dated" before the internet. I had relationships. I didn't go on "dates." This was like an experiment that went horribly awry for me.

I was in a 10-year committed, monogamous relationship until March of this year with a perfectly nice person who was not suited to me. The relationship had grown very dysfunctional, argumentative, and unhappy, and I decided to end it, even though I still liked and cared about my fiancé. He was devastated but ended up being very adult about it, and we were stuck living together for another month and two weeks before he could move elsewhere for the summer. He ended up going out of town. I resolved that I was going to be single for awhile and take time to heal from the breakup, etc. I did that for a few months. I went out dancing with girlfriends, had dinner parties with girlfriends, went to concerts with girlfriends and their boyfriends and husbands, went hiking with a girlfriend, read a lot of books, wrote songs and a scholarly article, wandered around a lot by myself in Hollywood and West Hollywood, and got lots of unwelcome attention from men wherever I went, because LA is a place where people are very forward about sex. I realized that I had not, in fact, shriveled up into a husk and blown away. In my relationship, I didn't even look at other people for nearly 10 years, other than to think, hmmm, he or she is attractive, oh well, that's moot, I'm in a relationship! It wasn't until near the end of my relationship that I even realized that maybe I was still attractive, or anything like that, to other people besides my partner. So, after ending it with him and being single for a bit, I began to wonder, what is dating all about?

I have never been a dater; I tended to form friendships with people, hang out a lot, and just end up with them eventually, or just fall head over heels for someone after spending a very long first meeting, talk to them for a long time, and end up with them quickly, and that's how I was ever in any of the relationships I'd ever been in. People kept saying, "Dating! It's fun! You go to dinner and just talk and you do it a few more times and see if you like them or not!" This sounded like an awful lot of work to me, to be honest, but I wondered if I wasn't missing something. It seems like a lot of my lady friends did this "dating" thing in high school, when I was busy mooning after my guy friends and eventually ending up with some of them, or just mooning after them to no avail. No one asked me on "dates." I never went to a school dance, not even my prom.

My luck with guys in high school was not amazing. I was every guy friend's best friend, the girl he went to to bitch about girl trouble, except for if we were alone and ended up making out, then avoiding each other for a few weeks after that out of awkwardness. I had a real boyfriend when I was a freshman, then I had no worthwhile boyfriends for awhile, just Guys to Hang Out With, then a great boyfriend my senior year and a couple of Serious Relationships as an adult. For this reason, at the age of 33, I was like, "Dating! I have heard of this before. I might as well see what it's like." That was in late July, after 4 months of the single life. I seemed to remember that POF was this free dating site that someone I knew had used and said was okay if you were willing to sift through a lot of uninteresting messages. The idea that a lot of people would write me uninteresting messages seemed almost too good to be true, because that would mean that there were actually people out there that might want to date me! What did I have to lose?

I generated myself a POF profile and realized I had no idea of what to say about myself, especially since characters were limited. How do I encapsulate myself? What did people really need to know about me? I took a personality test and was frustrated that it came up with "sapiosexual" as my personality type. How can my personality be described by a neologism saying I'm attracted to smart people? Are there people out there who find intelligence repellent? I did my best to give the people out there a decent idea of myself and went and looked at other profiles. I looked, and I looked, and I got more and more discouraged. There was something wrong with everyone! Anyone who liked good music didn't read. In fact, where were the readers on POF? I saw a couple of people who said they liked to read, but noticed punctuation and spelling errors in their profiles, which was discouraging. Finally, a guy wrote to me who had very few errors in his profile. He said he was planning on going back to school to become a doctor and was an old punk and rivethead. I thought he seemed pretty nice. I chatted with him a bit. He was quiet and respectful when I talked to him on the phone, so I agreed to go on A Date with him.

This led to me driving out to Burbank, where he took me to dinner, but he had already eaten, so he was just sitting there talking to me as I ate, then we had a drink at the bar near the restaurant and talked and no sparks flew. He asked to kiss me at the end and I said "okay" because I didn't want to seem unfriendly. He asked me on another date, and I "let" him kiss me again after another no-sparks dinner together, while staying stiff as a board and then pulling away. Why did I let him kiss me? Dating is horrible. I tried to pay my half of the ticket and he wouldn't let me. I drove myself home and ignored his texts for a few more days before working up the courage to say, hey, I think you are trying to move too fast and I'm not ready for a relationship, which was neither a lie nor true, because I really just had no particular urge to be near him again. I told him he was really nice and deserved a girl who was more suited to him, which was true. He told me what a nice person I was and said to have a happy and fulfilling life and to take care. Everything was nice. We were very, very nice to each other. It was terrible. I felt so depressed after that. He had glommed onto me and I just wasn't into it. That was the first date I ever went on, and I figured I was just having trouble getting used to dating, so I went on a second one before realizing I just wasn't into that guy. That strategy wasn't a very helpful one, as it turned out.

Then, I was asked on a date by a guy who said he was a skinhead, a punk, and a gentleman. We went on an okay first date. He asked me out again. I went out to visit him in Whittier, bringing my Trivial Pursuit game with me, and the whole thing was a fiasco. We got along poorly. I crashed over there, and in the morning, he had nothing to eat for breakfast, so I ate a Clif Bar that I'd brought with me, and he showed me how to make coffee in his Keurig when I asked him for a cup. His enthusiasm for the Keurig led him to enumerate its virtues to me in a way that resembled an advertisement, which made me remember that he wasn't a real punk, and that he was a compromised artist, because he worked in commercial art and made ads for a living. I left and never spoke to or saw him again, except to text and say that "I think it didn't work out" and that I wished him the best.

I gave POF one more chance and went on a very dull date with a man much younger than me who had pursued me. He was a graduate student at Pepperdine in public policy, so we had a conversation about politics, then he walked me to my car. I was irritated that I had driven out to Santa Monica for that. Dating sucks!!! I quit POF and whined to my friend Vanessa, asking her why I wasn't just going for it with a guy friend. She told me to quit mooning over guy friends and just try dating. I said POF made me die inside, so she persuaded me to join OKCupid by telling me that it had personality tests and quizzes and questions and other entertaining junk to help you find matches. QUIZZES? That's the magic word right there. I joined immediately and started taking quizzes. I wrote a very elaborate profile.

 Here, for your perusal, are some messages I got on OKC. I sent these as comments on my friend's page on Facebook because he seemed to think that women were going about interaction on online dating sites all wrong, based on his experience. I was trying to let him know that nobody was really doing it right.

"Sorry I couldn't finish reading your whole profile , it feels like a biography! Just joking.
Thought I'd drop in and say hello, you look like someone cool : )
Instead of reading all your profile, let me ask you a question:
If you have to use three words for describing yourself, what words would you use!"

Let's see. I'd go with "READ MY PROFILE." Here's another:

"howdee. i don't know most of your music references, but u will like me anyway. ;) you seem fun and you look cute hope you fancy connecting with a funny and nutty brit. x daniel."

It seemed presumptuous to suggest I would like him anyway in the way that he did. I ruled that out. No more bad dates. Besides, if you don't know the music I know, you probably don't know what I like or think about anything, because I've been part of a subculture for the majority of my life now, in a way. 

Then there was the guy that tried to impress me by telling me he'd read all of Infinite Jest, then asking if I wanted to have coffee. That was it. I wrote back to him to be nice, because I like David Foster Wallace and hadn't yet gotten to the stage where I ignored everyone, saying that he has good taste in books,  but got his name wrong in my reply on accident, likely due to my lack of interest, and he never wrote back. Then there's the guy that tried to impress me by saying he had a degree in astrophysics from Harvard, then mentioned that he wasn't looking for anything but "casual fun." Then the guy who sent me his erotica. Then the guy who sent me his Star Trek fan fic. HELP!!!!! Then... The guy that talked to me about his art at great length (I listened to his music and it was boring) and immediately started talking about how he both hates phonies and loves Westside Los Angeles, WHERE ALL THE PHONIES LIVE. Or the guy that talked to me about how cool my taste in music was and sent me a link to a video of his old band, which sounded almost exactly like a more upbeat version of Alice in Chains with smooth vocals, with a comment beneath saying they had nearly gotten signed and were probably going to get back together, and that I seemed "spiritual." GODDAMMIT. The guy who wrote saying, "You are a pretty lady. May i be Your slave?" The guy who asked if I was busy and felt like having fun when he wrote me at 4 a.m. The guy who said I seemed down to earth and nice, asked me what I do for a living, and when I said what I did, he made a joke about the French language and how silly it sounds to him, and said he took Spanish in high school but didn't remember any, then ignored me when I said I spoke Spanish and I bet he actually remembered some. Or the 39585923494 guys writing to say "hi how are you" without punctuation, the 3 women who did the same, the woman who told me I had beautiful taste in music and literature and posted scary naked pictures on her profile and was married with 4 kids, the woman who suggested that my profile made me seem like I had Asperger's Syndrome and then asked if I felt like having coffee sometime... oh shit. It got worse and worse. Then I made a few nice friends on there and quit before I started writing back sarcastic responses. My friend Vanessa, who'd persuaded me to join, begged me not to leave, but I left.

So. Here I am. Now I'm 34. I have heard people (well, my friends who are biased about me, anyway) say that I'm a good catch, so apparently the problem isn't either that I'm an unappealing person with a nasty personality, or that people don't like me. I have cogitated a lot on why I am single during the time that I have been single, and have come up with a few theories.

1. My standards are high. I don't think that's bad, it just means I won't find a lot of people I want to be with, which has always been true.
2. I don't like dating. I tried it. It wasn't much fun. I have a better time going out with friends or just being in a relationship, or sitting at home alone writing on my blog about how I hate dating.
3. I'm bad at people.
4. It's the wrong time.

There is also the matter that I think that most people just don't have their heads on straight about relationships and dating. I have had to hear a lot of sad things from my friends about their love lives over the years, and it seems to me like people are allergic to things like respect, patience, empathy, communicating honestly and openly, being considerate, and not immediately getting what they want. It is astonishing to me how many women, including me, have had guys that don't seem to notice or care whether we are into physical interaction with them and just seem to like trying to go as far as they can before we say no and make them stop. I really wish I'd just said "no, I don't feel like it" when POF Bad Date #1 put his arm around me or tried to kiss me. A lot of women seem to have the idea that we are being impolite and bitchy when we just say what we like and don't like, and this leads to an awful lot of problems with consent, because we sometimes seem to be giving it by not saying "no" when our body language is screaming "I'm not into this, I'm cold, I'm stiff, I'm freezing up, I'm turning away from you, I don't want that" but we're not actually saying anything. This sucks. I mean, good that my date didn't push me into anything once I got up and moved away, but I am mystified as to what part of my radical feminist brain burst into a chorus of "Don't be unfriendly! Give this guy a chance!" and stopped me from saying "No, thanks" when a guy I wasn't attracted to tried to kiss me, and why I was inclined to let him do it for a moment. If my dad (rest his soul) knew I was doing that, he'd tell me, "I don't understand why you're putting up with this shit. Tell that guy 'no.' Who cares if he's perfectly nice; you're not into him. You have agency and a right to say no. It's not impolite; don't let sexism tell you that your role is to be quiet." I resolved after that date never to be wishy-washy about consent ever again, and to be sure I give it and deny it when I want to, always.

But really, this listicle (which was barely written as a list at all, and makes me think that Cracked is really just insisting that everything be a listicle now for no reason other than marketing, even when the article was never intended as one, which is very frustrating to me!!) had a very valid point: some people go into dating looking mostly for sex with someone they think is attractive. They don't care if sparks fly. They do not give a fuck about relationships, compatibility, honesty, candor, supportiveness, romance, or any of that other stuff I like. Apparently my notion of sparks flying and currents of electricity passing between you and someone else because of your emotional and intellectual connection is one of which most people are unaware, or one in which they aren't the slightest bit interested. People seem to be very lonely and eager to find a warm body to spend time with, go to bed with, or spend their life with, as long as everyone is nice and things are okay, or even if no one is nice and things suck.

I mean, we all compromise a bit with a partner, right? Sure. That's normal. You see them when it works with your schedules. You agree on a place you both are okay with eating at if you don't both feel like eating the same thing, but want to go to dinner. Your partner isn't in the mood when you are, so you cuddle. you pick out a movie to watch together rather than one you would have watched by yourself automatically. Maybe you move to a place where your partner has found work and you just go along and find your work and be there with them for awhile, living, working, being okay with life. That all makes sense to me. I can make compromises. I have made them before and been fine. I refuse to compromise on other things, though, like someone who has different values than me, or vastly different ideas about what they want from their future than I do. 

Some people, though, apparently don't even care if the person they are with has a brain in their head, or a heart or a sense of compassion and empathy. They will compromise everything and never speak up for what they believe in, if they have convictions of any kind, so they can be with someone. This article seemed to show that there were a lot of people out there who were just gonna go for it with this garishly caricatured psychopathic girl they met on an online dating site. The attitudes that people have about who they will spend time with are terrifying. I don't want to go out there if those are the people who are out there, and they will write to me, and I will become frustrated. I'd rather not try, honestly.

So, that's the conclusion. This listicle made me glad I finished my little experiment with dating. I think that I might not be alone forever, but I will be fine if I am for a while, I suppose. I'd like to blame the internet, because this is online dating and it's tempting, and people have very unfortunate behaviors on the internet these days. They act as though it is a vacuum for words and actions, where you say something and it disappears, you never suffer any consequences, and if someone is mad, you either tell them they are wrong for having a reaction ("butt-hurt," as they say) and feeling something, or you apologize and all is forgotten forever. It is really tempting to say that the problem is the internet.

But I'm afraid that the problem is something deeper, a thing I can't address satisfactorily here, something that eludes my words and my theories, something that is hard to put my hands on, slipping always from my grasp as I reach out. It's something about how the world works now, how people see each other, what they will do in it, a thing I've never been quite able to understand entirely, and I have been thinking about these things for a long time.

I can tell you this: people would be a lot better off if they put work into re-learning the value of the words "yes" and "no." Say no when you don't want something. Say yes when you do. If you want a relationship with someone, or to kiss them, say yes, and say no if you don't. Don't equivocate and expect anything but your words to stand for you when important things are on the line. Your actions back up your words, but try to put your words first, because they're much easier to interpret. Don't do what the people in this listicle did and give a yes that you will regret down the line. I hear a whole sea of yes's that mean nothing and no's that no one else hears coming from the people around me. Stop it. Use your words correctly. A "date" is dinner where you see if sparks fly, and if they don't, don't keep trying with that person. Say no to them so you can find someone else who makes you want to say yes. If sparks fly, then yes, yes, that's great! Find someone who asks you things you like saying "yes" to and try to be around them.

That's what I've got. I hope it was either helpful or amusing or somehow good for you to read. My next blog will not be personal like this one was, but this listicle really got wheels turning in my head.

Monday, December 30, 2013

A Layperson's Guide on How to Talk, or, a Polemic Against the Rhetoric of the List Article and the Notion of Prescriptivism

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jennifer-ball/7-things-you-totes-need-to-stop-saying-if-youre-over-30_b_4375298.html

OK, hello, welcome, etc. I decided to inaugurate my blog by writing about something I think is fairly important: prescriptivism. What is prescriptivism? That is essentially the idea that is most useful to talk about how things should be done when you describe or evaluate them, rather than discussing how people actually do these things. In the context of linguistics, prescriptivism refers to us saying that people should say "To whom are you speaking?" instead of "Who are you talking to?" or "I am well, thank you," instead of "I'm doin' pretty good, how 'bout you?" The idea is that we prescribe the way that people should talk and write and use language, following preordained rules of grammar, structure, syntax, and idiomatic usage, and that people who deviate from those rules are doing it wrong. The opposite of prescriptive linguistics is descriptive linguistics, which is where we study the way that people actually use language, and describe what they do when we write and theorize about grammar and other usage.

What does this Huffington Post article have to do with that? This article is mildly irritating to me in that it is essentially a guide to prescriptive linguistics in the guise of humor and/or useful advice, courtesy of HuffPost. And it's a list! Why don't we get articles on the internet anymore? Why is everything constructed as a goddamned list? Are writers so terrible these days that they simply enumerate ideas instead of creating paragraphs with main ideas and transitions between them? Do we, in general, read so poorly that we can't follow articles anymore, and just need soundbites, snippets, lists, sentence fragments, and blips of information that remains unsupported and unstructured as real arguments? Or are these writers just lazy, or assuming that readers are lazy? I don't know how anyone reading these articles who doesn't already know how to read critically will ever learn how to do so, if this is how we expect ideas to be presented now. I am so against this. It's lazy expression, leads to lazy argumentation, and therefore, it's bad rhetoric. I cannot tolerate bad rhetoric much longer, or I shall become a prescriptivist. The only way I can handle this is to write satirical articles on a blog of my own.

Worse yet, it seems that lazy rhetoric is often accompanied by simply lazy ideas. Received ideas about language as a topic for a humorous editorial on HuffPost? Man, did someone get paid to write this piece??? To think of how many useless, unpaid words I write every day, when I could be making my living by just repeating other ideas over and over, but in a snarky tone. Here's what this boils down to: this article says slang isn't for real adults. Woah, because no one has EVER said that before and it's a total revelation. Additionally, what a silly idea in the first place! Wow, did you know that the moment you turn 30, you shouldn't talk the way that everyone else does, because it's undignified? Yeah, it's true! When you taste a really good recipe, better to cut your tongue out than let "This lasagna is amazeballs!" slip through your mouth. What is wrong with you? What aren't you behaving as you are supposed to? You should say, "This cheese sauce is unctuous, and the spices used are subtle. I feel that the vegetables are sauteed to perfection." You should of course, wait until you are done chewing, and not feel the need to say "mmmm!" as you chew. Just nod politely as you dab your mouth with a silk napkin. You host is surely awaiting your reply with polite, restrained enthusiasm attendant to your mutual position as people above the age of 29 spending social time in each other's company. Then you can drink some very expensive liquor and listen to inoffensive music and be very normative together. Everyone knows that the normal way that you talk is shameful and should never be done around other people.


In response to this exceedingly petty and finger-wagging list, I have created my own list of Approved Alternatives for Modern Slang that I would like to propose to you now, because I can be petty too, but I like to think that I'm funnier when I do it.


1. Instead of "totes," have you considered saying "unquestionably?" Ex: -- "Hey Audrey, I'm unquestionably ready to go!" -- "Are you excited?" -- "Unquestionably!"

2. How about instead of saying "I know, right?" you say "ita vero," or "sic," which is basically that, but in Latin, so it sounds a lot cooler and makes a fairly mindless, but friendly utterance ("I understood what you just said?! Right???") sound marginally more clever? It also has the advantage of not being a question stuck after a statement that you UNQUESTIONABLY understood, which can, admittedly, be a bit confusing as a concept. You could also say "unquestionably" for that one, and I'd still approve. "Uh-huh" or "yup" work too.


3. I propose that instead of the so-of-the-moment (and admittedly very dumb-sounding) word "amazeballs," we bring back other words and expressions that were once in that role in our vernacular, but now sound foolishly outdated, such as "the cat's pajamas," "spiffy," "neat-o," "bitchin," or the lately unsung, but still very good and TIMELESS, "very good." Remember, just because people say it now doesn't mean that they will always say it, so why should you even bother to talk the way other people talk now? Adults don't do that! Either pretend that you have no idea how people talk now, or just avoid slang whenever you possibly can.

4. Instead of "cray-cray," which, to me, actually sounds like saying the French word for "chalk," but with echolalia, I recommend you give my approved expression for the same concept a whirl. That expression is "someone I do not wish to spend any time with because they are grating and in poor touch with reality as others understand it." If you must use slang, I also like "bonkers." "Bonkers" has the slight advantage of sounding maddening and slightly deranged (it's almost an onomatopoeia, right?), and will really imbue your sentence with the essence of poor mental health. Ex: "Boy, people who enjoy list articles on the internet are just bonkers!" Be sure to strongly emphasize "BONK" in "bonkers" for maximum effect.

5. Here is one that I dislike, not because it's slang, but because it seems to be a thing that people with privilege have co-opted from some of the most downtrodden people in out society: poor people in gangs and in prison. Ha ha! It's so funny that I, a respectable white lady, am saying "I will cut a bitch!" when all of my gluten-free scones are gone at the coffee shop where I just paid $6 for a latte! You know, since everyone knows that I'd never ever do that, because I am not like that. Wow! They never saw that coming, huh? NO. IT'S NOT FUNNY. YOU ARE UNFUNNY WHEN YOU DO THIS. 

So, Instead of, "I will cut you," which seems mostly to be used by privileged white people demonstrating a very problematic (CAUTION: SOCIAL THEORY BUZZWORDS AHOY) attitude toward people living in marginalized sectors of our society afflicted by systematic discrimination, socially enforced structures of racism, classism, assorted other power imbalances, and other appalling things, as well as a corrupt penal system that punishes and deprives already oppressed people further, thus pushing them toward recidivism rather than rehabilitating them, I would avoid all of that crap and just intone very loudly, "IT'S THE FINAL COUNTDOWN." This will probably actually put the situation in your favor when you are stressed out in the check-out line at Whole Foods or when there are no more organic cotton yoga pants in a size xxs (yes, I intentionally used lowercase letters to write that size, since writing the smallest size possible in all caps seemed incongruous), because you will truly frighten people. Good! You scare me anyway. Your lack of self-awareness when it comes to your privilege horrifies me. It seems only fitting that you use an expression that shows your scary mentality even more clearly. It kind of troubles me that HuffPost feels that its overwhelmingly privileged audience are the people who need to be told not to say this, though, since they are exactly the people who are being most terrible when they say it.

Also, if you say "I will cut you/a bitch," for basically any serious reason (e.g., you really plan on cutting someone), you are someone I do not wish to spend any time with because you are grating and in poor touch with reality as others understand it.

6. Moving on, for "adorbs," might I recommend "mmmph" as you stuff a sock in your mouth to prevent yourself from talking unless you have something important and meaningful to say? Everyone knows that verbal filler is just there to make you and others comfortable, so why on earth would you cater to their needs or your own? Language isn't a social activity! It's purely a series of signifiers for important concepts, right? I will offer you a working example of how you may stifle your social instinct for language with a sock. 

Example: Your friend shows you a picture of a cat in a basket on the internet and says, "What do you think of this attractive photograph of a cat?" 
You: "Mmmph!" (This is the sound you make as you shove a nice, clean athletic sock into your mouth so you will not react to your friend's solicitation of social contact. You can also do it when you see such a picture yourself and are considering sharing it with others and saying that it is "adorbs.")

Honestly, your friend is trying to bait you by provoking what they think is a predictable reaction. You will find that your friend respects you more for not being like some sort of emotional marionette whose reactions they can manipulate. It is best to keep such tricksters guessing whenever possible, and only to look at cute animal pictures when you can exclaim "HOLY SHIT THAT CAT RULES! ARRRRGGGHHHH!!!" at home, alone, while drinking vegan egg nog out of the carton, as I do (bonus points for wearing pajama pants and an ancient Napalm Death t-shirt as you do this). 

Remember: your reactions are shameful because they are not approved by linguists! Only at home, alone, doing other shameful activities, should you talk the way that you wish to talk or express ideas that are not completely important ones. I mean, why should anyone care about how anyone feels when talking? Oh yeah, wait. Because we're humans? And we are social creatures? And we all have to live together? Yes, exactly. Those are exactly the reasons why you can make friendly contact with people by commenting on things being cute with whatever words you wish, as long as you are being respectful and kind to others. God, why do I even have to say this?

7. Finally, if you say "feels" in lieu of "feelings," and make it an occasion worth remarking on every time it happens because it is so rare, the fact that you have unnecessarily lopped off the second half of the word does not seem to be the only difficulty you are having with expressing yourself. I would recommend saying instead, "I am now putting a dollar into my therapy fund," if you are like, my goodness, I have an emotional response to this music, this event, or any other stimulus? What in blue blazes are these things I am feeling? What are they called again? Let's see, I FEEL them, so I will name these new things FEELS. If this is your problem, you are likely very, very repressed, and this has probably made some other troubles for you in your life. You have the choice of seeing a therapist who can help you feel things on a more regular basis and lead a happier life, or, you know, clamping down on those feelings some more and avoiding things that provoke them, so no one mocks you in an article on HuffPost for how you express your feelings. THOSE JERKS! You can say whatever you want to talk about your feelings, even though when you say "feels," I wonder what happened to the rest of the word. That is me, and I am not you, and your feelings are yours to express as you please.

Thus concludes Thea's Even More Petty List of Words to Say Instead of These Here Words on That List on Huffington Post (Content Suitable for English-Speaking Adults of All Ages). I hope this has served as a caution to you: express yourself only in the ways that are acceptable, or dammit, just shut the hell up, because grownups are talking.

No, but really, the next time you know anyone who is saying something like, "Boy, I just hate it when grown-ups say 'totes,'" now you not only have a rejoinder, but you can also do me a favor and link them to my blog to boost readership. OK, really, seriously now, I think the idea of telling people not to use slang because it sounds silly is not only pretty tired, since it has been happening ever since there has been slang, but useless and priggish. I don't especially like the way most of these words sound, but then again, I'm not in my 20's anymore. As a lady in her 30's, I have taken note that youth culture no longer is for me, and shaping the cultural Zeitgeist kind of isn't what I get to do much these days. 

I would not tell people older than 29 to stop appropriating youth culture, because not only will that not stop them, but damn, how horrible to imagine that life after 30 is nothing but staid dinner parties and adult contemporary smooth jazz concerts and book clubs and regional team sports! I'd rather not, thanks, even though every BuzzFeed list about being in your 30's seems to tell me that this is the general consensus on what my life will be like from here on out. How can I begrudge my fellows, who are going to spend New Year's Eve at a sober party playing board games, go to bed at one a.m., jog all day on the 1st because they are training for a half-marathon, then go back to work at the office on the 2nd, the harmless, frivolous pleasure of linguistic access to a more youthful, light-hearted, joyful life? 

Yeah, sure, I have a lot of work to do too. I can be serious about important things. I love my work, too, and I certainly don't get down on the weekends like I did 15 years ago. Thank god! I didn't like any of that much anyway! I like my life now! Do you know why? Because I have a career I love, but I also am who I want to be. I talk, dress, and express myself as I please. I can be a good educator and a good scholar, and go to the gym, and eat vegan, and keep in touch with my family... and I can also get tattoos, and listen to metal and punk, and use slang, and laugh, and go to horror movies and loud concerts, and be silly with my friends. It keeps me happy. I think the more people can feel comfortable being themselves, the happier they will be. If out-of-touch soccer moms want to say, "I know, right?!"... well, who cares if I don't like the way that sounds? I'm not a universal arbiter of everything that is good and pleasant. If it makes them happy, let them say it.

In short: let us not worry about lists on the internet that tell us how to act, think, speak, and be. Never take advice from a list; lists are the lazy person's articles, and are full of lazy ideas for lazy people. Do not let your mind become lazy. Keep it alive by feeding it and caring for it. Let us talk in ways that please us, for keeping your mind happy and creating joyful feel(ing)s is very important to humans of every age as we struggle against a world seemingly intent on making happiness yet another privilege accessible only to the elite. Happiness is a useful word for all of us.